Basic hosting plan

Treepl Backlog
1

Hi, some of our clients are running simple static html websites or one page landing pages. I wonder if it would make sense to have a basic hosting plan with very limited functionality, no emails, etc … What are your thoughts? Cheers, Erik

2

I’m certainly for that as I think it gets more users on the platform which allows for an easier and more likely upgrade path to higher Treepl plans if/when they grow. Rather than having to put them on some other hosting/CMS.
But whether this is an economical option for Treepl I don’t know.

1 Like
3

I agree. Would be good to have an html only hosting option, if it makes sense for treepl.

1 Like
4

@Eugene - Any comments on this, or should I just add it? :slight_smile:

5

I think @alex can comment on this better than me.

1 Like
6

Next week we will be having a closed meeting with active Treepl Partners.
Let’s discuss this subject there as well. I have some thoughts but we need more details from you on how this will benefit the platform and Treepl users.

2 Likes
7

it depends on how much it will reduce! maybe it makes sense to pay a little too much but have a good hosting service

8

I have always used a multi domain single hosting for these in BC, then spread the cost over how ever many I have on there.

1 Like